Their expert product reviews and you will advice guide publishers inside their conclusion and ensure that published scientific studies are legitimate, rigid, and you will credible. Writers come across fellow reviewers simply because of the in the-depth knowledge of the subject amount or types of work he is questioned to check on. So it options try priceless and you will irreplaceable. Fellow writers try responsible for the precision and you may viewpoints conveyed during the the accounts, and the peer feedback techniques operates to the an idea regarding shared trust ranging from writers, reviewers and you may editors. Even with rapid progress, generative AI tools features big constraints: they could use up all your right up-to-big date studies and can even produce nonsensical, biased or untrue advice. Manuscripts may also include sensitive and painful or exclusive suggestions which will perhaps not getting shared away from fellow review procedure. Hence we inquire one, when you find yourself Springer Character examines bringing the peer reviewers with use of safe AI tools, peer writers do not upload manuscripts towards the generative AI tools.
Or no the main investigations of one’s states produced in the manuscript was in in any manner supported by an AI equipment, i ask fellow writers to help you state using particularly devices transparently regarding the fellow comment statement.
Citations
Lookup articles and you will non-lookup content (age.grams. Viewpoint, Comment, and you may Statements content) have to cite appropriate and you can relevant literature meant for the newest claims made. Excessive care about-ticket, matched up jobs certainly one of numerous authors so you’re able to with each other mind-cite, gratuitous and you can way too many violation away from articles blogged on journal so you’re able to which the papers has been registered, and any other sorts of pass control try incorrect.
Pass control will result in the article becoming rejected, and may even feel claimed to help you authors’ associations. Furthermore, any initiatives of the fellow-reviewers or writers in order to encourage particularly practices is going to be reported by the writers on the copywriter.
- Experts must look into another assistance when preparing its manuscript:
- Any report in the manuscript you to definitely relies on exterior sources of information (i.e. perhaps not the fresh authors’ individual new information otherwise results or standard studies) would be to use a ticket.
- People is always to stop mentioning derivations out-of brand spanking new performs. For example, they have to cite the first work as opposed to a review post one to cites a distinctive really works.
- Authors is to make sure that the citations try specific (we.age. they must ensure the violation supports the new report built in the manuscript and should not misrepresent yet another works by the pointing out they in the event that it generally does not keep the part the fresh writers desire to generate).
- Article authors ought not to cite source they’ve maybe not discover.
- Experts cannot preferentially cite their otherwise its friends’, peers’, otherwise institution’s e-books.
- Authors is avoid citing work solely from country.
- Experts must avoid using a too much level of citations to support one-point.
- Essentially, writers should cite supplies which have gone through fellow review where possible.
- Article authors shouldn’t cite ads otherwise advertorial issue.
Preprint discussing and solution
BMC journals encourage upload regarding preprints away from number 1 lookup manuscripts towards preprint machine of one’s authors’ options, authors’ otherwise institutional websites, and unlock interaction anywhere between researchers whether with the people preprint host or preprint leaving comments systems.
Preprints was identified as a keen author’s particular a report manuscript prior to authoritative peer remark at the a journal, which is deposited to your a public machine (since the described inside the Preprints for the existence sciences. Technology 352, 899901; 2016); preprints may be published at any time inside the fellow opinion techniques. Send away from preprints is not thought earlier in the day publication and will not threaten believe within BMC publications. Manuscripts released for the preprint machine may not be considered whenever deciding the improvement available with a study in question on a beneficial BMC journal.
BMC has actually hitched having Search Rectangular ( BMC have a majority need for Research Square) to incorporate During the Remark, a journal-provided service for preprint discussing, supporting authors across the communities i serve to express its browse early. Article writers submission for some BMC journals are also able to in public share information about their fellow remark by way of For the Opinion. Standard details about Inside Remark at the BMC and Lookup Square preprint system can be obtained right here this is how .